Tuesday 7 July 2015

Controversial trial of GM crop shows no benefits

Science Focus

original post »

In 2012, protesters descended on an unlikely target: Rothamstead, the oldest agricultural research center in the world and a nonprofit that focuses on sustainable food production. The protesters weren't simply upset with some of the work going on there; they announced in advance that they planned to destroy it. The reason? It involved genetically modified crops.

Researchers at Rothamstead had introduced a gene from peppermint into wheat, allowing the crop to produce a chemical that aphids use as an alarm signal. In lab tests, aphids had avoided wheat carrying the additional gene, suggesting that the GM wheat could limit the need for pesticide applications. The lab findings, however, needed to be validated through field trials. And anti-GMO activists decided that these trials posed an unacceptable risk to the public and farmers and needed to be stopped.

With heightened security, the trials went forward, and the results have now been published. It turns out that the summer the trials were run was cold and rainy, and aphids as a whole didn't do well—there were so few even the control plants were "well below the recommended [pesticide] spray thresholds for summer aphids in the UK." The aphids that were present, however, didn't seem to mind the presence of the alarm pheromone on the transgenic wheat.

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

 
#science 
 » see original post http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/science/~3/5bLS10t94ko/
See Zazzle gifts tagged with 'science'

No comments:

Post a Comment