Since most foam materials are made of petrochemical plastics, they aren’t very climate-friendly. But now an alternative is
The post Wood-derived foam materials has been published on Technology Org.
#materials
See Zazzle gifts tagged with 'science'
There are advances being made almost daily in the disciplines required to make space and its contents accessible. This blog brings together a lot of that info, as it is reported, tracking the small steps into space that will make it just another place we carry out normal human economic, leisure and living activities.
Since most foam materials are made of petrochemical plastics, they aren’t very climate-friendly. But now an alternative is
The post Wood-derived foam materials has been published on Technology Org.
SpaceX has announced that the first major test of its Crew Dragon (aka Dragon V2) is expected to take place tomorrow, May 6, from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) in Cape Canaveral.
For the first launch of the Crew Dragon capsule, SpaceX will be performing what's known as a pad abort test, which will test the capsule's launch abort capabilities. While the next test after this one (the in-flight abort test) will launch a Crew Dragon using a full-size Falcon 9 rocket, this first test will see the Crew Dragon take off from the launchpad using its own integrated SuperDraco thrusters. The capsule will ascend to around 1500 meters (4,900 feet) before separating from the trunk section; it will then deploy its parachutes and land about 2,200 meters (7,200 feet) down range in the Atlantic Ocean.
The Crew Dragon's launch abort system is very different from how it's usually done. In the case of Mercury, Apollo, and Soyuz, the launch escape is provided by way of a rocket on top of the capsule, which ignites and pulls the crew away from the main launch vehicle. This system works, but unless the rocket is actually used (and you pray it won't be), it is simply extra weight that has to be jettisoned a few minutes after launch. Crew Dragon's launch abort system consists of eight SuperDraco thrusters that are built into the capsule itself, which is much tidier way of doing things.
Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments
Drizzling honey on toast can produce mesmerizing, meandering patterns, as the syrupy fluid ripples and coils in a
The post Boiling down viscous flow has been published on Technology Org.
In these polarized times, it's always a relief to find something liberals and conservatives have in common — even if it has nothing to do with politics. New research suggests that, at least in Europe, people who lean decisively right or left get considerably more exercise than those in the center.
"Busy people at both ends of the political spectrum do not seem to have as much time for idleness," writes a research team led by Adrian Bauman of the University of Sydney's School of Public Health. In contrast, centrists do more sitting, "both on the fence and elsewhere."
Bauman's study, published in The BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal), used data from the Eurobarometer, a survey conducted on behalf of the European Commission. Participants (with a mean age of 46) were from 32 European nations; all indicated their political orientation on a scale of one (far left wing) to 10 (far right wing).
The researchers compared responses from three groups of people: Those on the far left (the 6.8 percent who listed themselves as a "1" or "2"); those on the far right ("9" or "10"); and those in the center (the remainder). The two extreme groups were each comprised of around 1,900 people, while more than 17,000 placed themselves in the broad center.
All participants listed their "weekly minutes of vigorous intensity activity, moderate intensity activity, and walking," the researchers note. "These scores were summed to estimate total physical activity." A separate question asked them to estimate "total daily minutes of sitting time."
According to those self-reports, people on both the right and left engaged in a greater amount of total physical activity than those in the middle — approximately one hour more each week. They also enjoyed (or at least endured) larger doses of vigorous activity, clocking in at roughly 30 minutes more per week than centrists.
Those who reported no political affiliation were the most sedentary, spending 40 minutes less time on physical activities per week than those in the center.
Total sitting time did not differ all that much, with leftists and centrists at similar levels. Compared to those groups, right wingers spent an average of 13 minutes less per day on their butts. All of these findings still held true after adjusting for age, sex, education, and country.
"Centrists and the politically uncommitted may be at greater risk of non-communicable diseases because of their inertia," Bauman and his colleagues warn. "The politically uncommitted and centrists could consider adopting a stronger political stance for their health."
That doesn't seem likely to occur, which may be just as well: At this juncture in history, it doesn't seem wise to encourage extremism, even if it could improve people's health.
Still, it's interesting to consider the possibility that there could be a link between the obesity epidemic, and the apathy reflected in recent mid-term election's low turnout rates. If Americans follow the same patterns as Europeans, those in the "mushy middle" are more likely to have mushy physiques.
Pacific Standard grapples with the nation's biggest issues by illuminating why we do what we do. For more on the science of society, sign up for its weekly email update or subscribe to its bimonthly print magazine.
More from Pacific Standard...